Site Map
Top Menu
Main Menu
- Firm Overview
- Attorney Profile
- Services
- Why Choose Us
- Articles
- Articles
- FCC Proposed Expansion Of the OTARD Rule
- Internet Choice in Apartment Buildings
- Advice for Developers: Preempt Disaster
- Avalon – Georgia’s First Fiberhood
- Aereo 2 – Broadcast Networks Zip
- Access to Utility Poles for FTTH Providers
- Local Management of Public Rights-of-Way
- Making MDU Broadband Competition Work
- The Lockbox Problem
- Cable Home Wiring Rules And Cable Competition
- Are the FCC’s Inside Wiring Rules Still Relevant? Part I: Home Run Wiring Rules
- MDU Access in a Nonexclusive World, Part 3: Evolving Economic Models
- MDU Access in A Nonexclusive World, Part 2: Easements and Licenses
- MDU Access in a Nonexclusive World
- No Online Cable Systems -- For Now
- Still No Online Cable System -- Sky Angel vs. Discovery Channel
- MDU Owners Can Hit a Home Run
- Will Video Franchise Reform Stick? And Will It Work?
- Are Exclusive MDU Access Agreements on Thin Regulatory Ice?
- Public Rights-of-Way and Marketing Exclusivity
- Reality Check on Net Neutrality
- Negotiating an MDU Access Agreement
- FTTH in Multi-Tenant Environments: Some Regulatory and Competitive Questions
- Supreme Court Rules for Cable in Brand X Case
- The Case For Municipal FTTX
- The Case For Municipal Broadband
- Who Owns the Inside Wiring?
- FCC and Brand X Internet Services: Part Two
- FCC and Brand X Internet Services: Part One
- A Legal Perspective On FCC Boosting Broadband
- Legal Strategies for MDU Owners
- Ownership Of And Access To Inside Wiring
- Industry Urges FCC To Enhance Competition In MDUs
- Competitive Access to Cable Inside Wiring in MDU Buildings
- Blog
- Common Terms
- FCC Proposed Expansion Of the OTARD Rule
- Internet Choice in Apartment Buildings
- Advice for Developers: Preempt Disaster
- Avalon – Georgia’s First Fiberhood
- Aereo 2 – Broadcast Networks Zip
- Access to Utility Poles for FTTH Providers
- Local Management of Public Rights-of-Way
- Making MDU Broadband Competition Work
- The Lockbox Problem
- Cable Home Wiring Rules And Cable Competition
- Are the FCC’s Inside Wiring Rules Still Relevant? Part I: Home Run Wiring Rules
- MDU Access in a Nonexclusive World, Part 3: Evolving Economic Models
- MDU Access in A Nonexclusive World, Part 2: Easements and Licenses
- MDU Access in a Nonexclusive World
- No Online Cable Systems -- For Now
- Still No Online Cable System -- Sky Angel vs. Discovery Channel
- MDU Owners Can Hit a Home Run
- Will Video Franchise Reform Stick? And Will It Work?
- Are Exclusive MDU Access Agreements on Thin Regulatory Ice?
- Public Rights-of-Way and Marketing Exclusivity
- Reality Check on Net Neutrality
- Negotiating an MDU Access Agreement
- FTTH in Multi-Tenant Environments: Some Regulatory and Competitive Questions
- Supreme Court Rules for Cable in Brand X Case
- The Case For Municipal FTTX
- The Case For Municipal Broadband
- Who Owns the Inside Wiring?
- FCC and Brand X Internet Services: Part Two
- FCC and Brand X Internet Services: Part One
- A Legal Perspective On FCC Boosting Broadband
- Legal Strategies for MDU Owners
- Ownership Of And Access To Inside Wiring
- Industry Urges FCC To Enhance Competition In MDUs
- Competitive Access to Cable Inside Wiring in MDU Buildings
- Articles
- Links
- Contact Us
Receive an Executive Summary of your Telecommunications Contracts
Many MDU property owners and management companies do not pay sufficient attention to their existing telecommunications and cable contracts. If that's true of your company, you may be overlooking opportunities to leverage additional value from your assets.
Therefore, as a free service for my clients, I offer a detailed confidential review, examination, and assessment of your existing cable and telecom agreements. Click here.
For More Information
Testimonials
|
"Our 399 unit condo decided to move from a bulk cable service contract to a competitive cable service environment. Carl helped us manage the complicated process of terminating the multiyear bulk contract ... |
|
Member, Board of Directors |
In wake of the FCC’s Notice of Inquiry called Improving Competitive Broadband Access to Multiple Tenant Environments, competitive access to multi-tenant properties is again a burning public policy issue. We intend to summarize the controversy in a series of blog entries in the coming weeks.
Recent Articles
FCC Proposed Expansion Of the OTARD RuleProviders should explore the possible implications of the rule change and share comments with the ... MORE |
Question of the Day
-
A bulk service agreement differs from a non-bulk or “retail” agreement (also known as an “access agreement” or a “right of entry agreement”) in that under the former it is the property owner (or, in the case of a condominium or other common interest development, the homeowners’ association (“HOA”)) – and not the individual subscribing resident – that receives and pays the monthly invoice from the service provider.
Continue Reading
Contact Info
Carl Kandutsch Law Office
2520 Avenue K, Suite 700/760
Plano, Texas 75074
Telephone: (214) 427-5354
Mobile: (207) 659-6247
Email: carl@kandutsch.com
Connect with me on 
The Kandutsch Law Office has been selected by Broadband Communities Magazine as one of the nation's "Top 100 Technology Providers" for 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015
Click Here For a Free Comprehensive Executive Summary
©2014 Carl Kandutsch Law Office
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
Attorney Website Design by The Modern Firm